beowulf7 wrote: "Perceived Domineering" is a) subjective b) quite possibly the best way to expose someone's dishonesty.
beowulf7 wrote:Objecting? me??![]()
Nothing really, just voting against policing to the point of outlawing "perceived domineering"
beowulf7 wrote:I'm in a period of reflective posting - not trying to change the world
schocker2 wrote:I do not participate in discussions which go personal. It is a new rule. So if you want to attack one's intelligence or views as being ignorant I will just not respond to you. No hard feelings or anything like that. Life is just to short to waste one's time.
schocker2 wrote:I do not participate in discussions which go personal. It is a new rule. So if you want to attack one's intelligence or views as being ignorant I will just not respond to you. No hard feelings or anything like that. Life is just to short to waste one's time.
Antigonos wrote:schocker2 wrote:I do not participate in discussions which go personal. It is a new rule. So if you want to attack one's intelligence or views as being ignorant I will just not respond to you. No hard feelings or anything like that. Life is just to short to waste one's time.
I agree that it is unproductive to attack someone's intelligence. But there is a valid place for pointing out that an argument or viewpoint is illogical, uninformed or contradicted by evidence so long as the one who does this gives the basis for such an assertionThis is not rude. This is debate.. One should also try not to place someone in a "dismissed"category when that ignores the specific details of the individual's remarks and apparent thought processesThis depends on whether the conversation is civil. The poster certainly can determine whether they wish to continue or dismiss..
schocker2 wrote:It never needs to be personal. Because a personal has a view you do not agree with that does not give you or anybody the right to bring on the personal attack. Whether on this site or others it is just rude.
A wrote:To simplistically blame such reactions on Islam would be blind at best and mendacious at worst.
S wrote:A good argument (not that I agree, but you have some good points) and then the "If you believe something different from me you are blind (or stupid)" ending. Why not just leave it as a educated discussion?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests