World Influence Spring 2017

[asudevil]

I know when I'm GMing I count the first and discount any duplicates, but the forum default rule is to call it a hold and I don't see anything about it in asudevil's house rules, so unless I missed it somewhere I think Antigonos is correct...

...which is a nuisance, since that would affect the order I screwed up.

I agree..I count them as holds...but even with holds, unless Im mistaken (which if I am ... holler at me)...it doesn't change the map...cause it was 2v2 attacking with a strength of 2 defending anyway...yes?

[VGhost]

I know when I'm GMing I count the first and discount any duplicates, but the forum default rule is to call it a hold and I don't see anything about it in asudevil's house rules, so unless I missed it somewhere I think Antigonos is correct...

...which is a nuisance, since that would affect the order I screwed up.

I agree..I count them as holds...but even with holds, unless Im mistaken (which if I am ... holler at me)...it doesn't change the map...cause it was 2v2 attacking with a strength of 2 defending anyway...yes?

Well, I ordered support "Skm", which isn't a territory (certainly not Akm), so it depends whether you're counting that as a bad-but-intelligible order (goes through, 2v2 bounce), or a bad-and-disallowed order (support doesn't happen, Akm destroyed 2v1). Which one you did wasn't clear from the adjudication... I'd appreciate the first, naturally, but if GM'ing myself I'd disallow my order, so... yeah.

[Antigonos]

I know when I'm GMing I count the first and discount any duplicates, but the forum default rule is to call it a hold and I don't see anything about it in asudevil's house rules, so unless I missed it somewhere I think Antigonos is correct...

...which is a nuisance, since that would affect the order I screwed up.

I agree..I count them as holds...but even with holds, unless Im mistaken (which if I am ... holler at me)...it doesn't change the map...cause it was 2v2 attacking with a strength of 2 defending anyway...yes?

Well, I ordered support "Skm", which isn't a territory (certainly not Akm), so it depends whether you're counting that as a bad-but-intelligible order (goes through, 2v2 bounce), or a bad-and-disallowed order (support doesn't happen, Akm destroyed 2v1). Which one you did wasn't clear from the adjudication... I'd appreciate the first, naturally, but if GM'ing myself I'd disallow my order, so... yeah.

If both the AKT to AKM order and the SKM order were disallowed by a strict Deuteronomy sort of God (asudevil) the AKM units is destroyed and URA moves to AKM and ARC moves to URA.

[asudevil]

Being as how there is no SKM territory...and I have been allowing Nigeria to post orders as NG instead of LAG all game (both players)...Im going to allow to support of AKM (with the warning to be careful,,,its your "gimme")

[AardvarkArmy]

Damn... that's what happens when you wait to write orders until the last minute

I just noticed the map does NOT reflect the EGM-GOH move last spring.

The order is clearly showing as "resolved" so I am going to submit an order for "Fleet GOH" and not for "Fleet EGM"