
Agree mambam was incompetent in this game.

Keirador wrote:Stop being a dickasaurus rex.
Dude, presser, the reason I was so harsh in my diplomacy with you is because you were so rude to me in every message I sent you after I stabbed you. It was like you literally were unable to forgive it. If you are going to play like that, then I'm going to seem like a poor diplomat. I get a bit bristly with rudeness. Also, I will note that some of my all party messages after my stab were intentionally trying to provoke you by appealing to the spirit of the game and such to get you to realize that France legitimately was not a solo threat anymore without your assistance and that you had no reason to throw the game as a result.
Keirador wrote:Stop being a dickasaurus rex.
presser84 wrote:so once again, is there a proposal in there or do you want to keep whisper sweet nothings to me while you fuck me up the ass?
Keirador wrote:Stop being a dickasaurus rex.
marsman57 wrote:Frankly, I need a 5th power to stay in the game for various reasons. Things were working out not so well with my diplomacy with you so I chose to make that mambam by supporting him to take Ankara. If you eliminate him though, I will support you to stay in the game for quite some time.
I know it's a pretty crappy deal, but it's all I have to offer now.
Keirador wrote:Stop being a dickasaurus rex.
marsman57 wrote:I know you're upset about my stab and we had some heated messages back and forth about the virtue of the game, etc.
I really don't have any intention of staying my current attack of you. I've piddled around at 4-6 SCs entirely too long in this game and need to try to make some decisive gains if I am going to be competitive enough to remain in it for the long haul.
That said, but for various reasons, I think making an effort to completely eliminate you might be premature. I've been analyzing the balance of power (and "powers") in this game and I think there is a lot more left to be played than meets the eye and a small Turkish state could play a decisive role in that game. There are few true stalemates in Vain Rats.
Any thoughts? If you have no interest, I understand. I'm just trying to offer something more interesting than the standard "fight for your life" over your last few SCs.
Edit: Note that in VR1 that Russia made it into the draw with one SC.
Keirador wrote:Stop being a dickasaurus rex.
haroonriaz wrote:If only you could, Turkey. Your Sultanate is in a state of impotence, my dear friend. You can't even threaten to throw the game away anymore.
Keirador wrote:Stop being a dickasaurus rex.
presser84 wrote:haroonriaz wrote:Dear Turkey
I know you have been badly treated by the alliance and especially Russia.
However, you can still have the last laugh by capturing Trieste, if you want.
My army in Tyrolia can help you move to Trieste from Adriatic if you are interested.
Let me know.
Germany
how about fuck you for changing my orders and fucking me over this turn?
Keirador wrote:Stop being a dickasaurus rex.
Okay, back to the ALA, as I said I was surrounded by allies, and I actually agreed with stalin's assessment that Turkey could've hit 9 the year following my stab. If he had accomplished this, he would have dropped 3 builds right next to me. Is it truly unreasonable for me to expect that he would not have then felt comfortable enough that the ALA had succeeded and then leverage that to start an anti-Russian campaign. I know you think I am being overly generous to say you could've got to 9-10 in the next year, but just for the record, if you had managed it, and I had not stabbed you, and we were now looking at a scenario where you are at 9 and France is at 12, can you honestly say you would've have stabbed Austria or I?
Keirador wrote:Stop being a dickasaurus rex.
presser84 wrote:Okay, back to the ALA, as I said I was surrounded by allies, and I actually agreed with stalin's assessment that Turkey could've hit 9 the year following my stab. If he had accomplished this, he would have dropped 3 builds right next to me. Is it truly unreasonable for me to expect that he would not have then felt comfortable enough that the ALA had succeeded and then leverage that to start an anti-Russian campaign. I know you think I am being overly generous to say you could've got to 9-10 in the next year, but just for the record, if you had managed it, and I had not stabbed you, and we were now looking at a scenario where you are at 9 and France is at 12, can you honestly say you would've have stabbed Austria or I?
Love the Austria and I part of it. You don't need to cuddle up with him anymore. The game is over.
I really hadn't planned for after the ALA. Like I said to you. I came into the game as a sub and had not planned to play it till the end. I wasn't really paying much attention to the game or my position. The previous Turkey seemed to think France was a threat, there was an ALA against France. That was what I was focusing on.
Rather than approach me diplomatically you just stabbed out of fear. I would have been limited in my army builds so an inland push didn't make much sense. I was very content to just move through the med and be the France "container." I had not even thought about my solo chances.
So, like I said, before. You had your own solo ambitions and decided that was the time to go for it. All the other stuff about me being a threat was invented by you to justify your own desires. You then treated me poorly diplomatically and underestimated me (or maybe underestimated France idk). You keep trying to transfer culpability for YOUR loss onto me but when you leave me no credible options and show that you wish to eliminate me I AM MAXING MY CONTRIBUTION by ensuring you lose and France solos.
The fact that the players in this game are incapable of figuring this out is mind boggling to me. Seriously. Can someone, maybe someone who wasn't playing in the game, come in and explain to me how what I did was illogical or against the spirit of the game?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests