Moderators: Zoomzip, Telleo, bkbkbk, condude1, sjg11
Telleo wrote:I don't think I've ever met someone who more perfectly embodied Chaotic Neutral than Condude1.
kimbyrle wrote:nanooktheeskimo wrote:condude1 wrote:I'd say shirt is worse from an abrasiveness standpoint. The issue is that Crunkus would sometimes flood the thread. And I mean pages upon pages. And a lot of it would be abrasive.
I'm just saying that he's not as bad as some players make out, and that he deserves a better legacy than "That jerk".
My impression of him is formed entirely from the debates section, his conflicts with site mods, and a diplomacy game played with him, not from mafia. He was mostly abrasive and a dick in most of those interactions--not always, and to his credit he was usually right, it was just the way he went about being right that made me not want to interact with him.
I haven't heard much, but when I asked ZZ about him, one example he brought up was Crunkus quoting an entire post and simply replying with "Vomit." That's too abrasive for me.
nanooktheeskimo wrote:Parabellum wrote:We'd finally get to experience your famous New England accent/syntax/mannerisms. Until now, I've had to imagine you as M*A*S*H's Winchester (RIP).
The accent comes and goes, but the light to medium condescension is there for life
kimbyrle wrote:nanooktheeskimo wrote:condude1 wrote:
I ran that as the first game I ever GMed!
I am really glad I never had to play with Crunkus.
I've heard stories that make me echo this sentiment.
Nanook wrote:C O W A R D
shadow wrote:I did not always see I to eye with Crunkus at all, but he's probably the best player I've ever encountered, and he definitely held me to a higher standard and encourage my development as a player. Also an excellent GM. Him leaving seemed a long time in the coming based on communication difficulties and the fact that his play style was so distinct.
Anyways, I don't see much point in this conversation, and it's not cool to talk about someone who's not there.
nanooktheeskimo wrote:shadow wrote:I did not always see I to eye with Crunkus at all, but he's probably the best player I've ever encountered, and he definitely held me to a higher standard and encourage my development as a player. Also an excellent GM. Him leaving seemed a long time in the coming based on communication difficulties and the fact that his play style was so distinct.
Anyways, I don't see much point in this conversation, and it's not cool to talk about someone who's not there.
*shrugs* You haven't seen him say some of the things I've seen him say. However, agreed that since he's not here to talk for himself and my issues with him have exactly nothing to do with mafia, this is better off dropped in this thread.
Nanook wrote:C O W A R D
UpsideDownChuck wrote:We should play with video chat so I can see what you goobers look like and how it matches my perception.
Nanook wrote:C O W A R D
shadowface wrote:nanooktheeskimo wrote:shadow wrote:I did not always see I to eye with Crunkus at all, but he's probably the best player I've ever encountered, and he definitely held me to a higher standard and encourage my development as a player. Also an excellent GM. Him leaving seemed a long time in the coming based on communication difficulties and the fact that his play style was so distinct.
Anyways, I don't see much point in this conversation, and it's not cool to talk about someone who's not there.
*shrugs* You haven't seen him say some of the things I've seen him say. However, agreed that since he's not here to talk for himself and my issues with him have exactly nothing to do with mafia, this is better off dropped in this thread.
I'm not going to go dig up crap on Crunkus right now. It's not cool. But I will tell you, especially since I played with him as the site's "newbie young'un (his words)", I did not always agree with him and on more than one occasion was hugely offended by him. Doesn't mean he was wrong.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests