Round 1, Debate 4: Discussion Thread

This sub-forum is for tournament-style team debates.
subforum mods: Crunkus, Jlet, sock, and Palin

Moderators: Crunkus, Palin, Keirador, Jlet, sock

Round 1, Debate 4: Discussion Thread

Postby Crunkus » 31 Jan 2012, 23:55

This thread is for the purposes of discussion concerning Round 1, Debate 4 of the Playdiplomacy Debate Tournament #2.

This is NOT the debate thread itself.

  • Anyone may currently post to this thread excepting:

    • InterMPC
    • Philby
    • super_dipsy
    • weaverde
  • Judges will only discuss the scoring of the debate privately and may not be able to answer questions in this thread if asked.
  • Please be respectful of the fact that there is a competitive debate going on currently when you post to this thread.

It is acceptable for students and academics to cite Wikipedia in their research.
Topic submitted originally by: Rockport

Arguing the affirmative: The Colonials
Arguing the negative: The Old Empire

Thank you, and enjoy the debate!
--The Judging Team
Posts: 17650
Joined: 05 Feb 2009, 23:51
Class: Star Ambassador
All-game rating: (944)
Timezone: GMT-5

Re: Round 1, Debate 4: Discussion Thread

Postby bertogatti » 16 Jul 2012, 19:19

Interesting topic. I once saw a debate about this between two really smart people (the affirmative won.)

By the way, is citing Wikipedia as a source to defend Wikipedia a bit dodgy?
User avatar
Posts: 13
Joined: 26 Jun 2012, 12:22
Location: Somewhere in the Alps
Class: Diplomat
All-game rating: (1000)
Timezone: GMT+1

Return to Tournament Debate

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest