Improving Forum Games

Play a Diplomacy variant with a human GM using either forum PMs or Discord for communication. PbF games include a wider variety of maps and rules than what our site (or any site) can support!

Moderator: Morg

Forum rules
Questions about variants being run on the main site go here.

Improving Forum Games

Postby Pedros » 16 May 2012, 15:36

We've had quite a number of cases lately where GMs have had problems managing the games they're running, and with some GMs leaving games half finished. This is extremely frustrating for players who have put in a lot of time to making those games as competitive and enjoyable as possible, and I've been talking to some of the more established GMs about what should be done about this.

A big problem is that when players decide for the first time that they'd like to GM a game they have little idea of what is involved, both technically and also in terms of the time required. It takes quite a lot of time to keep a game running smoothly, and also newer players often don't realise that a Forum Game, even a relatively small one, can sometimes take many months to complete.

We don't want to limit the number of GMs around - the growth in interest over the last few months is enormously encouraging - but we do need to make sure that games are run well. So we feel that players wishing to GM for the first time should meet some simple qualifications such as actually having completed a Forum Game as a player and having a basic understanding of what is involved. We are working on the details now; in the meantime, if you are interested in becoming a GM then please contact me first by PM

See viewtopic.php?f=135&t=29099 for more details of the new arrangements
"Sooner or later, one of us will stab the other. But for now we're both better off as allies" (kininvie)
User avatar
Pedros
 
Posts: 12465
Joined: 25 Jan 2009, 12:59
Location: Somewhere full of gorse and brambles, West Cornwall
Class: Star Ambassador
Standard rating: (1085)
All-game rating: (1314)
Timezone: GMT

Re: Improving Forum Games

Postby asudevil » 16 May 2012, 15:38

Thank you Pedros for taking a look at this.
Captain FANG, forum team championships WINNER
Part of the surviving nations of WW4/Haven

Unless I am in the cheater's subforum. 99% of what I say is NOT as a mod.
User avatar
asudevil
Premium Member
 
Posts: 16575
Joined: 18 Jul 2011, 02:20
Class: Star Ambassador
Standard rating: 1351
All-game rating: 1447
Timezone: GMT-7

Re: Improving Forum Games

Postby rick.leeds » 16 May 2012, 17:41

Thanks, Pedros.

Actually, I think we'll probably need to insist that if you want to run a Forum Game, and you haven't done so before, you contact Pedros. Forum Games are more about the enjoyment players get playing them than anything else and that enjoyment is more than hampered by a GM having to quit the game. Of course, there are times when circumstances change and, as a result, a GM has to drop out and we understand that. It's happened before and it will happen again. But we want to minimise that whilst still giving people the chance to run games and everyone the opportunity to enjoy them.
World Diplomacy Forum.
Online Resources editor at the Diplomatic Pouch.
Don't let the stepladder get you. Watch where you're stepping. ANY step could be a doozy.
User avatar
rick.leeds
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 8360
Joined: 11 Jan 2009, 04:40
Location: Wherever I am, I'm scratching my head.
Class: Diplomat
Standard rating: (1158)
All-game rating: (1070)
Timezone: GMT

Re: Improving Forum Games

Postby stalin813 » 17 May 2012, 09:50

I waited a year before I tried GMing a game on the forum. I think I am doing a semi-decent job, but I think maybe there should be some waiting period enforced. It's great to bring new ideas to the table, but GMing is not only a bigger commitment in terms of time, it's also in terms of people. People rely on you.
Best to get me at night (8pm to 12pm EDT)
User avatar
stalin813
 
Posts: 912
Joined: 23 Jan 2011, 10:42
Location: Georgia, USA
Class: Ambassador
Standard rating: (982)
All-game rating: (1279)
Timezone: GMT-5

Re: Improving Forum Games

Postby marsman57 » 19 May 2012, 05:58

Basically, if someone can't be online at least 18 hours a day and always post adjudications within 10 minutes of the deadline, they should not be allowed to be a GM. ;)

But really, I definitely think that the person needs to be experienced in forum games beforehand. I would not necessarily require they have completed a game (as they could have been in WWIV for 8 months! :) ), but I would require they have experience in playing a forum game for several months as well as a good track record of minimal NMRs in all forum games played. I would also recommend dissuading any new GM from starting a second (or third! or fourth!!!) game before they show they can consistently meet deadlines in the first game.

DiploNEV is a good example to put up here. I do not mean to be critical of him, but he has always run a pretty decent NMR record between school obligations, after school activities, and I think once getting grounded. He's a good kid, but his level of commitment to the site is really not enough to be a GM, and I think that could be seen before he created his first game, much less his third.
marsman57
 
Posts: 1473
Joined: 05 Oct 2009, 21:42
Class: Star Ambassador
Standard rating: 1118
All-game rating: 1128
Timezone: GMT

Re: Improving Forum Games

Postby stalin813 » 19 May 2012, 06:22

marsman57 wrote:Basically, if someone can't be online at least 18 hours a day and always post adjudications within 10 minutes of the deadline, they should not be allowed to be a GM. ;)

But really, I definitely think that the person needs to be experienced in forum games beforehand. I would not necessarily require they have completed a game (as they could have been in WWIV for 8 months! :) ), but I would require they have experience in playing a forum game for several months as well as a good track record of minimal NMRs in all forum games played. I would also recommend dissuading any new GM from starting a second (or third! or fourth!!!) game before they show they can consistently meet deadlines in the first game.

DiploNEV is a good example to put up here. I do not mean to be critical of him, but he has always run a pretty decent NMR record between school obligations, after school activities, and I think once getting grounded. He's a good kid, but his level of commitment to the site is really not enough to be a GM, and I think that could be seen before he created his first game, much less his third.


I know this isn't the solution, but as an experienced player, I stay away from games GM'd by relatively new GMs for fear of losing the game.
Best to get me at night (8pm to 12pm EDT)
User avatar
stalin813
 
Posts: 912
Joined: 23 Jan 2011, 10:42
Location: Georgia, USA
Class: Ambassador
Standard rating: (982)
All-game rating: (1279)
Timezone: GMT-5

Re: Improving Forum Games

Postby asudevil » 19 May 2012, 06:52

marsman57 wrote:Basically, if someone can't be online at least 18 hours a day and always post adjudications within 10 minutes of the deadline, they should not be allowed to be a GM. ;)

But really, I definitely think that the person needs to be experienced in forum games beforehand. I would not necessarily require they have completed a game (as they could have been in WWIV for 8 months! :) ), but I would require they have experience in playing a forum game for several months as well as a good track record of minimal NMRs in all forum games played. I would also recommend dissuading any new GM from starting a second (or third! or fourth!!!) game before they show they can consistently meet deadlines in the first game.

DiploNEV is a good example to put up here. I do not mean to be critical of him, but he has always run a pretty decent NMR record between school obligations, after school activities, and I think once getting grounded. He's a good kid, but his level of commitment to the site is really not enough to be a GM, and I think that could be seen before he created his first game, much less his third.


This is what we are attempting to deal with in a fair way. Glad to see there are some people seeing where we are coming from
Captain FANG, forum team championships WINNER
Part of the surviving nations of WW4/Haven

Unless I am in the cheater's subforum. 99% of what I say is NOT as a mod.
User avatar
asudevil
Premium Member
 
Posts: 16575
Joined: 18 Jul 2011, 02:20
Class: Star Ambassador
Standard rating: 1351
All-game rating: 1447
Timezone: GMT-7

Re: Improving Forum Games

Postby aphyer » 09 Nov 2017, 06:34

So, I haven't been involved with PBF games much, so potentially stupid noob question here, but: surely substitute GMs are a lot more viable than substitute players? If you replace an NMR-ed player with a substitute, all the relationships and communications are destroyed, but if you replace a GM that isn't a problem. How feasible is it for GMs who need to drop out to find a backup GM to handle adjudication?
aphyer
 
Posts: 2
Joined: 04 Feb 2016, 08:25
Class: Ambassador
Standard rating: (1071)
All-game rating: (1101)
Timezone: GMT

Re: Improving Forum Games

Postby nanooktheeskimo » 09 Nov 2017, 09:22

aphyer wrote:So, I haven't been involved with PBF games much, so potentially stupid noob question here, but: surely substitute GMs are a lot more viable than substitute players? If you replace an NMR-ed player with a substitute, all the relationships and communications are destroyed, but if you replace a GM that isn't a problem. How feasible is it for GMs who need to drop out to find a backup GM to handle adjudication?

It's possible sometimes, but it really depends...sometimes the GM running the game is the only one with access to the map, for example, especially if it's a variant they designed. If they have to drop out for a RL emergency, they might not have the time or inclination to send that map to someone else, and if they drop out because they lose interest they're even less likely to send it to a sub GM.

On the other hand, sometimes if a GM knows they're going to be unavailable for awhile but don't want to pause the game, they can hand it off for a little while.
Platinum Classicist
(h/t lordelindel)

I am your (co-) Leader.

GM of WitA 7, WitA 8.

Come play face to face!

Need a forum game GM'ed? PM me!

Mod (but I'm normally not talking as one)
User avatar
nanooktheeskimo
Premium Member
 
Posts: 9590
Joined: 19 Jun 2014, 19:52
Location: East TN
Class: Star Ambassador
Standard rating: 1209
All-game rating: 1389
Timezone: GMT-5


Return to Play-by-Forum Dip

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests