Harb wrote:condude1 wrote:Justy, the Sjg vote was a wagon vote on a weak point that was retracted as soon as the vote started losing steam and a solid defense begins for Sjg from myself and others.
Again, let's talk about this whole "wagon vote" thing. Was the issue one you can't see town justy believing was a scumtell? I find that hard to believe. If you think town justy might have believed it was a scumtell, what exactly is he supposed to add to that other than what he did? Explain why "wagon vote" is anything more than mudslinging here.
If the point is weak, why is Telleo exempt from your criticism? Because it's a perceived slip and people attach a vote to "Gotcha!" moments. Okay. But presumably town justy can know those feels. Why is arriving at the point INDEPENDENTLY important? Keir also gets some credit here from you. Okay, but absent people who aren't caught up don't we just have one person who can independently arrive at this conclusion? That means 6 of 7 townies aren't allowed to find this point valid because someone already did.
Additionally, if it's a weak point, why is justy LEAVING a weak case more indicative than Telleo sticking with it? Wouldn't you expect town justy to dump a weak point relatively quickly?
I second most of this. I understand the gut reaction to dislike justy's vote, because I felt it too. That said, I don't think there's actually any substance to a case here. This doesn't seem like something justy does differently if he's town vs if he's scum. Harb's points RE: me getting a pass on this questioning are also valid.
I'm not sure I bite on that last line though. Personally, I'd expect a scum to try to bail out earlier than a town, because the town has a vested interest in pursuing a lead to make sure it goes nowhere, while a scum has an interest in not being caught making unsupportable arguments.
justy wrote:I'm curious about what Telleo is currently thinking (I assume I'll find out when I read further. I'm not sure if she wash pushing back against my vote because of it's timing or because she didn't think I had strong enough reasons. If it's latter, I'm surprised she hasn't move her own vote.
Thyrfing seems to have issue with you [SJG] handling Condude and him differenlty. IIRC Telleo said something about this as well. I have to look back to it later (or see if it's further discussed in thread when I read on) to comment it.
I wasn't pushing back against your vote. I was investigating your reasons for it, because I wanted to see if you were hopping on my bandwagon or legitimately trying to make a case. Satisfied, I stopped "pushing."
Also, I had issues with Sjg handling Condude and Thryfing differently. Thyrfing was the one who said something about this as well. Important distinction, because I was the one doing the questioning, and Thryfing was the one saying "Yeah, that's weird."
Condude wrote:Hrmph, I thought I was defending Sjg harder than that. Still, I got the feeling from the thread no one was joining the lynch any more. I'll reread after lunch to see if that was a valid interpretation.
I don't really recall you defending Sjg on this point. Would you be so good as to link me to a post or two?
Harb wrote:Thyrfing, what value do you see in "not planning" that isn't fulfilled by the two groups plan? What value do you see in a cig remaining secret?
Probably been answered by now, but just in case it isn't I'm interested in this too.
justy wrote:2) Condude1 reminds me more of scum smelling blood than town trying to resolve my alignment. He is trying to sell his vote for Harb and others, not know why I did what I did.
This same sentiment goes for Thyrfing. I doubt they're both scum however because they're on same target so early. But condude has showed more of his reasoning, which I find both bad and contradicting to his own early D1 play (re True Love early vote).
So why is Condude pushing an argument more scum indicative that Thryfing, who's scumreading you but not engaging to make the case?
sjg11 wrote:As for justy... I have serious issues with his comments about my plan being town indicative. I feel like justy is smart enough to know that people proposing pro-town ideas is not a town indicative statement at all.
Asking as someone who has not played with justy before - is this true? It's certainly a mistake a lot of new town players make. Has justy shown that he understands this point in previous play?
Thyrfing wrote:Thyrfing wrote:Telleo wrote:I expected to get exactly what I asked for. Why do you find my question to be a dangerous breach of security, but asking about the motivations behind it isn't?
Yes, I do. Asking the town questions about their roles with no objective other than knowing information about their roles (that's what you just stated you expected to get) is scummy as hell. As in information fishing.
Questioning scummy behaviour is my job as a townie.
Still interested in that
Telleo
Then you'll love reading my response
here. Meanwhile I still have mail to you
here.Harb wrote:
Also: Thyrfing
This makes me happy.

Also, I'm liking the questioning going on in
this post, and will be eagerly awaiting Thryfing's response.
Harb wrote:Telleo wrote:I have no idea where you get the idea that Harb is any kind of scumread from me. What gave you that impression?
Also, for the record, just because I scumread someone doesn't mean the plan they propose is bad- see Sjg's point that as scum, he'd propose town-positive plans because it's what he'd do as town.
Actually, I sort of did the same thing when I saw your organization in a PPE. It looks like a list of your reads, not who people are supposed to target. I couldn't figure out how you suddenly had scumreads on condude, me, fuddin, and justy.
Ok, I see how you might think that at first. But does Thryfing really believe that I have a townread suddenly on Sjg? And given the context of that post, he doesn't figure out my meaning?
I mean, not really a point, I guess, cause I can see where the confusion comes from. Just doesn't seem like a well thought out post.
---
I'm caught up through page 27, but I have to go to work now. If I have free time, I'll try to start in on Page 28, but I likely won't make much headway before about 11 tonight.