Game Players
ENGLAND (unfunfunt) WINNER
FRANCE (jstott)
ITALY (Crunkus)
GERMANY (shockj) WINNER
AUSTRIA (Philby)
TURKEY (Dar Krum)
RUSSIA (DOI)
Let's hear what all you treacherous buggers were thinking.
My report is quite simple; I was thinking that I had a decent deal in place with both Austria and Russia. I felt that going with the Austrians was the better way to go. (Gut. The game was Anon, so I just decided.) Philby played the betrayal perfectly. I thought he and I were good, then he takes Bulgaria while allowing the Russians into Rumania. I franticly bring my units home to make a stand and make some calls for help.
To no avail. Pope Crunkus the First decided to spread his particular brand of believe into the heathen regions of Turkey. The only hope that I began to see was that the Austrians, treacherous dogs that they were, had turned on the Russians. I figured that was fantastic as it would give me breathing room. Again, no dice. The Germans and Austrians AND English proceeded to make short work of Russia. I was simply an afterthought, stuck in a corner as I was.
The Fall of '04 saw the fall of Constantinople. That was pretty much it. My biggest question would have to be the English thought process? They ended up with a piece of the win, but it seemed to me that there was a an obvious Central Triple at work. Generally the English would be the odd man out in that scenario. I guess karma bit Chancellor Philby of Austria. And I, for one, couldn't have been happier!



